0.03/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 960
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 04:36:46 EDT 2022
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.47	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.20/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.20/0.47	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting almost_fo_3_lam with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 29413 completed with status 0
0.20/0.48	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.20/0.48	# No SInE strategy applied
0.20/0.48	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF11-SHSSMFNN
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting sh7 with 325s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 61s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting lpo1_lambda_fix with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_ho_7 with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_1 with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# full_lambda_1 with pid 29424 completed with status 0
0.20/0.48	# Result found by full_lambda_1
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.20/0.48	# No SInE strategy applied
0.20/0.48	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF11-SHSSMFNN
0.20/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.20/0.48	# Starting sh7 with 325s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 61s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting lpo1_lambda_fix with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting new_ho_7 with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_1 with 55s (1) cores
0.20/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.20/0.48	
0.20/0.48	# Proof found!
0.20/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.20/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_22, type, mrel: mworld > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_23, type, mactual: mworld).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_24, type, mlocal: (mworld > $o) > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_25, type, mnot: (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_26, type, mand: (mworld > $o) > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_27, type, mor: (mworld > $o) > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_28, type, mimplies: (mworld > $o) > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_29, type, mequiv: (mworld > $o) > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_30, type, mbox: (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_31, type, mdia: (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_32, type, eiw_di: $i > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_33, type, mforall_di: ($i > mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_34, type, mexists_di: ($i > mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_35, type, cs: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_36, type, sue: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_37, type, mary: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_38, type, john: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_39, type, math: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_40, type, psych: $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_41, type, teach: $i > $i > mworld > $o).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_42, type, esk1_1: mworld > $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_43, type, esk2_0: mworld).
0.20/0.48	thf(decl_44, type, esk3_1: mworld > $i).
0.20/0.48	thf(mlocal_def, axiom, ((mlocal)=(^[X1:mworld > $o]:((X1 @ mactual)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mlocal_def)).
0.20/0.48	thf(mbox_def, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X1:mworld > $o, X3:mworld]:(![X5:mworld]:(((mrel @ X3 @ X5)=>(X1 @ X5)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mbox_def)).
0.20/0.48	thf(mexists_di_def, axiom, ((mexists_di)=(^[X8:$i > mworld > $o, X3:mworld]:(?[X7:$i]:(((eiw_di @ X7 @ X3)&(X8 @ X7 @ X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mexists_di_def)).
0.20/0.48	thf(mand_def, axiom, ((mand)=(^[X2:mworld > $o, X4:mworld > $o, X3:mworld]:(((X2 @ X3)&(X4 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mand_def)).
0.20/0.48	thf(query, conjecture, (mlocal @ (mbox @ (mexists_di @ (^[X7:$i]:(teach @ X7 @ cs))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', query)).
0.20/0.48	thf(db, axiom, (mlocal @ (mbox @ (mand @ (teach @ john @ math) @ (mand @ (mexists_di @ (^[X7:$i]:(teach @ X7 @ cs))) @ (mand @ (teach @ mary @ psych) @ (teach @ sue @ psych)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', db)).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((mlocal)=(^[Z0:mworld > $o]:((Z0 @ mactual)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mlocal_def])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0:mworld > $o, Z1:mworld]:(![X5:mworld]:(((mrel @ Z1 @ X5)=>(Z0 @ X5)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox_def])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((mexists_di)=(^[Z0:$i > mworld > $o, Z1:mworld]:(?[X7:$i]:(((eiw_di @ X7 @ Z1)&(Z0 @ X7 @ Z1)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mexists_di_def])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((mand)=(^[Z0:mworld > $o, Z1:mworld > $o, Z2:mworld]:(((Z0 @ Z2)&(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mand_def])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~(![X15:mworld]:(((mrel @ mactual @ X15)=>?[X14:$i]:(((eiw_di @ X14 @ X15)&(teach @ X14 @ cs @ X15)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query])]), c_0_6]), c_0_7]), c_0_8])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X17:mworld]:(((mrel @ mactual @ X17)=>((teach @ john @ math @ X17)&(?[X16:$i]:(((eiw_di @ X16 @ X17)&(teach @ X16 @ cs @ X17)))&((teach @ mary @ psych @ X17)&(teach @ sue @ psych @ X17)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[db]), c_0_6]), c_0_9]), c_0_7]), c_0_8])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X21:$i]:(((mrel @ mactual @ esk2_0)&(~(eiw_di @ X21 @ esk2_0)|~(teach @ X21 @ cs @ esk2_0)))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X22:mworld]:((((teach @ john @ math @ X22)|~(mrel @ mactual @ X22))&((((eiw_di @ (esk3_1 @ X22) @ X22)|~(mrel @ mactual @ X22))&((teach @ (esk3_1 @ X22) @ cs @ X22)|~(mrel @ mactual @ X22)))&(((teach @ mary @ psych @ X22)|~(mrel @ mactual @ X22))&((teach @ sue @ psych @ X22)|~(mrel @ mactual @ X22)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i]:((~((eiw_di @ X7 @ esk2_0))|~((teach @ X7 @ cs @ esk2_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X3:mworld]:(((teach @ (esk3_1 @ X3) @ cs @ X3)|~((mrel @ mactual @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (mrel @ mactual @ esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ~((eiw_di @ (esk3_1 @ esk2_0) @ esk2_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X3:mworld]:(((eiw_di @ (esk3_1 @ X3) @ X3)|~((mrel @ mactual @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.20/0.48	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_16])]), ['proof']).
0.20/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.20/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 35
0.20/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.20/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 30
0.20/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 21
0.20/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
0.20/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 10
0.20/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.20/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.20/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 10
0.20/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.20/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 4
0.20/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
0.20/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.20/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.20/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 4
0.20/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.20/0.48	# NegExts                              : 0
0.20/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.20/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.20/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.20/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 10
0.20/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.20/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.20/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.20/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
0.20/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
0.20/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 5
0.20/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.20/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.20/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.20/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.20/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.20/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.20/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.20/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.20/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.20/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 10
0.20/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.20/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1280
0.20/0.48	
0.20/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.48	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.20/0.48	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.20/0.48	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.20/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1860 pages
0.20/0.48	
0.20/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.48	# User time                : 0.014 s
0.20/0.48	# System time              : 0.008 s
0.20/0.48	# Total time               : 0.021 s
0.20/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
0.20/0.48	EOF